| Re: Quality of the photos ? | Roly | :: | 2009-10-27 8:27 |
| Very good observation Filipe! I have not paid much attention to the beta version lately, and you correct. The images on the beta site are roughly 10% larger, which is strange since I was under the impression that they would be posted pixel for pixel... We would need somebody with computer graphics expertise to clarify this serious problem. In any case, if the new version of the site automatically compresses the images by 10%, this will automatically result in loss of sharpness, and this effect is obvious. Roland |
|||
| [Only registered members may post.] [Flat View] [Translate] | |||
| Thread | Username | Date | |
| Quality of the photos ? | sacavem
| :: | 2009-10-27 04:02 |
| :Re: Quality of the photos ? | sacavem
| :: | 2009-10-27 04:17 |
| :Re: Quality of the photos ? | Roly
| :: | 2009-10-27 08:27 |
| :Re: Quality of the photos ? | John_F_Kennedy
| :: | 2009-10-27 09:35 |
| ::Re: Quality of the photos ? | feather
| :: | 2009-10-27 10:14 |
| :Re: Quality of the photos ? | Didi
| :: | 2009-10-27 10:21 |
| :Re: Quality of the photos ? | Tayon
| :: | 2009-10-28 07:12 |
| :Re: Quality of the photos ? | stego
| :: | 2009-10-30 17:23 |
| :Re: Quality of the photos ? | macondo
| :: | 2009-11-06 16:11 |
| :Possible explanation | linask
| :: | 2009-11-07 03:33 |