Aborigines and evolution theory

Critiques [Translate]

•  
• ianmcall (1213)
• [2004-05-09 5:09]
• [+]

What does your opinion of science have to do with a portrait? Or this web site?

•  
• MARIUS (2240)
• [2004-05-09 13:26]
•  [Show CommentHide Comment]

•  
• oddmodd (0)
• [2006-11-12 19:33]

Nice strong shot but a bit hazy... possibly due to the lighting at that time of the day.

ps... I agree, evolution is comical at best. Black Africans have clearly populated the entire planet as evident with their indigenous presence on many southeast Asian Islands including Australia, New Guinea and the Phillipines, The Olmecs of Mexico who predate the Mayans, The black Native American people of the California such as The Folsom people and other parts of the US, The first Greeks (The Pelasgians), The Midianites, Elamites, Sumerians (who called themselves the black-headed ones), Akkadians, early Babylonians, Canaanites, Tribe of Judah (who Herodotus wrote are obviously brothers of the black Egyptians based on thier black skin) Phoenicians, etc of the ancient middle east and of course Africa. All these black indigenous people looked today as they did 500,000 yrs ago. Secondly, if each stage of mankind lead to the extinction of their predecessors then how come primates did not fall to extinction as did the Neanderthal, Cro-magnum and other Homo Erectus. If an inability to adapt was the evolutionary cause of early man's extinction and each one was smarter than the last then the primates should have surely fall from the face of the earth, if indeed each stage of man started with primates. Bullcrap and no scientist can argue this point.