Photographer’s Note
Autumn in Lake Wanaka. The golden poplar trees around the lake at Wanaka really do make for great photography. Combined with a blue sky, you are in postcard photography heaven.
Polariser, ND Grad, 1/8 second, F19, ISO 100
Aliine, kiwi_explorer, ollie59, luisafonso, mobileman has marked this note useful
Critiques | Translate
Aliine
(1905) 2007-05-26 5:21
Hello Adam,
Very nice composition, colours and reflection.
I like especially the stones in the foreground.
Very well done.
Aline
kiwi_explorer
(12195) 2007-05-26 7:25
Hi Adam,
I also find autumn a spetacular time for photography in the South Island especially in Otago area. I like your technique of using low angle shots and slow speed. This another excellent composition to add to your impressive gallery. Perfect! tfs
Cheers,
Renier
testmaniac
(12072) 2007-05-26 7:28
Hi Adam,
This is realy good landscape!
Colors and reflections are great!
TFS
Philip
daddo
(11324) 2007-05-26 8:35
Hi Adam. Pristine scene with clear water that shows us its bed and also the heavens in the reflections. Beautiful colours and light. I like this bottom heavy PoV, making us firmly rooted in the spot. Well done. Regards. Klaudio.
cherryripe
(18931) 2007-05-26 12:07
Hi Adam
It's definitely worth going to NZ in autumn with such colours. The sky is beautiful too. Well composed photo with the big rock in one corner and the curve of the lake's edge drawing the eye to the mountain in the background. Excellent sharpness of the smaller rocks too.
Regards
Nikki
Cormac
(26449) 2007-05-26 12:10
I like the curving lines of this, which are doubled because of the reflection. Great near/far type of compostion too, and of course the colours are brilliant. Great work!
dkeus31
(26154) 2007-05-26 13:51
Hello Adam,
Very nice composed view, the curve starting in the edge with the bigger stone and the lovely reflexion of the golden trees in the water, great.
regards
Didier
Matthew-Watt
(4463) 2007-05-26 20:27
Hello Adam,
Not to be in any way rude, but it seems that for the amount of attention your images receive, you give little back in terms of responses. You have given 166 critiques in return for an approximate 3,675 you have received. That’s about 1 critique you write for every 22 you receive. I am very impressed by your images, they show fantastic detail and awesome scenery (this is no exception), however it would be nice to hear more feedback from someone who possesses so much photographic skill and talent. Take care.
Matt
ollie59
(776) 2007-05-26 22:05
hi adam well i for one know that you dont use loads of photoshop unlike others .This is another great shot,and its down to hard work finding the right places and planning .Take no notice of some folk mate ,i for one know that you deserve way more than petty comments
ollie
madziabis
(254) 2007-05-28 2:34
This is excellent. I really like point of view and this amazing clarity
vikous
(2217) 2007-05-28 3:27
Ok, Adam, i'll get back to you soon.
Take care, thanks for your quick response.
viktor
luisafonso
(858) 2007-05-28 7:44
Hi Adam! I usually don't comment your pictures because I strongly believe that sharing is one of the key benefits about this site. It wouldn't be as good without it and, contrary to some other communities where I have been, I really get the sense that you can get "proper" critiques as long as you know and understand the people behind them. But you decided not to critique and I respect your decision. That's why I follow each post of you in silence. I read your reply to Matt and that made me understand your point even more (even if I slightly disagree with some points). It's true you would get hundred of points for each one, as your average level is way beyond the majority of us, but you would also get honest feedback from other - good - members who simply refuse to critique a member that doesn't share... For me, it's a privilege to have you here, to see your photos frequently, but I would love even more to learn from you and that's hard if you even don't share the exposure details with us.
That said, let me comment on this one. Love your composition here and your color rendition. The elliptical shore lends an intense sense of depth to the entire compo and the way you managed to get crisp details from the most foreground rock to the mountains in the back was very well controlled. You really know how to use the hyperfocal technique. The wide angle feel is cool, but probably I would like to see the trees a bit more vertical. I understand your choice because probably it would ruined the right curve and you used all the pixeis available to build your compo, but it's a thought I would like to share with you. The horizon seems a bit tilted (in the top left bellow the the dark mountain) and I don't think you could blame the wide angle distortion for that. But I can be wrong, of course. It's a great shot, with vibrant colors and a great reflected light in the water. Love it.
Stay safe, l.
PS: See your reply to Viktor. I am with you on this one... *sigh*
Propofol
(1786) 2007-05-30 3:05
Fabulous job. The ultrawide has done terrific work here, and it's all in sharp focus. Bravo!
mpr
(327) 2007-05-30 13:33
Hi Adam
Another excellent compostion. I've been quietly viewing your work for sometime now and often visit your personal site and Timecatcher. Congrats on winning the Wanderlust award. With the stringent requirements they place on submissions I'm even more impressed with the quality of your RAW shots.
It's rare to see you post a picture in less than perfect lighting but regardless I really like the composition and vibrant colors. What often draws me to your photos is the lighting and composition. I know you take great care to achieve the right composition so each picture you post I often try to "reverse engineer" it in order determine what portions of the shot led to your decsion. On this site, you have very few equals and your work has inspired me to get my own set of Lee grads and have a go at it. I do have a question however. Hopefully, you might have some time to answer. With the Lee Foundation Grad kit how do you manage to use the polarizer? You use a 105mm polarizer if I remember correctly, but how does it integrate with the Foundation kit. I've checked the LeeUSA site, but I'm still unsure how it's all managed. Any help you are willing to provide is appreciated.
Mike Ryan
rgarrigus
(0) 2007-05-30 17:42
Hi Adam,
A classically solid Adam Burton composition here but for me (personal observation only) the color of the sky is a bit over the top - probably the polarizer on already stunning colors. Although I'm still a newbie I subscribe to the Joe Cornish, David Ward philosophy that the filtration shouldn't be quite so evident. This stands as a rare example in your portfolio where the filtration shows itself. If my eyes don't mislead me Luis' observation about the appearance of a slightly wonky horizon is just a sympton of the shoreline sloping upward to the trees and nothing you could change really. Now if I could only achieve a shot half this good I'd be ecstatic! You're great and I learn from your work daily.
Photo Information
-
Copyright: Adam Burton (AdamBurton)
(8062) - Genre: Places
- Medium: Color
- Date Taken: 2007-05-00
- Categories: Nature
- Camera: Canon EOS 5D, Canon 17-40 F 4L
- Details: Tripod: Yes
- Photo Version: Original Version
- Theme(s): Ney's favorite pictures of New Zealand! [view contributor(s)]
- Date Submitted: 2007-05-26 5:05
- Favorites: 2 [view]
Discussions
- To vikous: Victor (7)
by AdamBurton, last updated 06-02 13:10 - To mpr: Thanks (3)
by AdamBurton, last updated 05-31 03:50 - To rgarrigus: Thanks (4)
by AdamBurton, last updated 05-30 17:30 - To mpr: Link (1)
by AdamBurton, last updated 05-30 15:05 - to Adam (1)
by vikous, last updated 05-28 16:34 - To Matthew-Watt: Matt (1)
by AdamBurton, last updated 05-27 03:50 - To Matthew-Watt: thank you (1)
by vikous, last updated 05-26 21:03








