Ayers rock

Critiques [Translate]

•  
• rychousmama (407)
• [2006-09-23 21:08]

Incredible colors and a nice, simple composition, but why is there a little bit of blur? Maybe sharpening it on Photoshop would work?

•  
• Emiel_Skyfreak (2949)
• [2006-09-23 23:11]

The idea and the scene are nice. But the quality is so not nice..Very blurry, sky overexposed, the foreground dark on the sides. And blocky overall. It looks like a paint, or heavy post processed, more something for TrekLens I think.
The composition is well, okay..but not that interesting. A rock, some bushes, all in the middle.
Lots of jpeg artifacts. I wonder how you've done this, you've used 191kb, almost near the limit, but it's still..well..not so good. Let me have a look at the other shares, I might judge them better.
Please check quality of next postings..or maybe post heavy post processed images on TrekLens. I didn't learn much from the world here.
I'm sorry for maybe being rude. I just don't like, maybe others do.

•      
• Vicky (1430)
• [2006-09-24 2:56]
• [+]

Hi Lucio,
I tend to agree with Emiel here, although to me it looks like you took this shot in the dark and have tried to lighten it up - therefore losing some of the quality in the process. The presence of the moon and the overexposed sky could back up this theory. There is fringeing around the rock, so maybe you have already attempted sharpening? Alternatively, judging by the date this picture was taken and the absence of camera data, it could be an old photo that you have scanned? Either way, the quality is not so good and a more detailed note may have told us why. There are some good, clear shots in your gallery, but I'm afraid this is not one of them.