Photos

Photographer’s Note

Yesterday I posted a photo with the Endless Column by Constantin Brancusi in winter, with snow and fog, showing only the lower part of it. Flory did not really like it, and when I answered her comment I thought of what might be the right context for it.

Sculptures are unlike paintings, they don´t stand for themselves, they need a context. Brancusi, when he designed the column, had forseen a wide path leading across the park directly towards it. In the last renovation of the park and the column this path has disappeared. It had given the entire ensemble a direction, while today it is standing amidst a grass island, and people are uncertain whether or not they are allowed to walk across the grass to get closer to it. Maybe Brancusi had wanted it to be touched, now it´s quite strange to walk towards it.

But what is the right context for a piece of art, for a sculpture? Is it the houses that had been there when the place for the column had been chosen, the trees that grew beside it, the people that see it every day, play, grow up and get old in its presence? The clouds that pass above it and change every second?

The world changes, the column remains. The communists tried to pull it down with a tractor, but the column resisted. Stands there, in its definitive simplicity and beauty, unimpressed. In a poor, underdeveloped, small, forgotten town somewhere in Romania. Strange.

I´ll have to go back and try again.

flory, nemesiss, jorgi has marked this note useful

Photo Information
Viewed: 479
Points: 6
Discussions
  • None
Additional Photos by Johannes Becker (johannes68) Gold Star Critiquer/Gold Star Workshop Editor/Gold Note Writer [C: 317 W: 136 N: 693] (2860)
View More Pictures
explore TREKEARTH