
abanibi 2007-11-02 14:05
Hi Peter! Well, I still don't know what he's doing... Is that a sword? A stick? And the white thing on the water? Maybe the problem is the photo is a bit too small to appreciate what's going on. And the white points in the sand, noise maybe?
I like the colour of the sea and the contrast between sand, water and sky And I think I'd go even farther and crop most of the sky (which is a bit washed out); or go to the other extreme and make it vertical (and bold). Anyway it sort of reminds me of Rothko, but with a very theatrical element added (the man, hat, gloves and all).
TFS, and kind regards.
Inés
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
You and I both recognise the weaknesses in these image, although my issues are different than yours, I will try to address the points your bring up, not that I necessarily disagree but to show my point of view. What he is doing, is it a sword of a stick? My question would be if it's important? for me not, quite irrelevant, what is important that he seems somewhat out of place, as you notice the hat, gloves etc seems a bit theatrical, would fit in theather but seems out of place on the beach. Photo too small to appreciate. I have used the max allowed net of the frame, can't do anything about it. White spots on the sand is simply various debris. Washed out sky. I see it as pleasently light blue in contrast of rich blue of the water, actually I feel that the colour is the strenght of the image. For me the weaknesses of this image come from it lacking originality if you will, everything is proper, according to the rules, geez I could even be faulted for using the rule of thirds here, it's is just too simple, yet I like it because it shows somewhat absurd out of place situation which at this same time links the intriquing human being with nature and it's greatness. If not for that the image would have been in the garbage been. Thank you, appreciate your time and effort. Peter |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Hi again, Peter! The 3 layers of colours are certainly great in the photo. I guess my question "What's he doing?" just reflects my natural curiosity. I wonder what he's doing as you wondered why :-) But you're right, it makes no difference.
As for the supposed lack of originality, I quite don't agree with you (though of course I'm no great photographer). You choose a classic composition, centered on the landscape, but then blow it with the man who looks so theatrical, so out of place. And that's original. And one more thing I forgot: congratulations on your 142nd! See you around. Take care! Inés |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|