Though I'm not overly concerned by status, I'm nevertheless intrigued by members' status on this site, in particular my own. After 2 years and "gold" accredition for critiques, workshop edits and notes, and having 3397 points from 183 postings, I'm still classed as a "junior" member. I know there are many members senior to me in terms of longevity, postings, points, critiques and so on; similarly I have noticed plenty who haven't been members for nearly so long, have fewer postings, points, are "favourites" of fewer other members, yet are "senior" members. Can you explain to me the logic of this? As a retired photography lecturer, "junior member" strikes as a little odd.