Critiques

Jipp (26) 2004-02-06 23:19

Tout a fait daccord. Celle-ci est beaucoup mieux. La 1ere m'avait laisse sur mon apetit et je crois savoir pourquoi en voyant la 2e:

Je crois que la composition remet les fleurs comme sujet principal. L'ombre, qui est tres interessante neanmoins, doit rester sujet secondaire sinon les fleurs ont l'air inutile(comme dans la 1ere photo). L'ombre vient donc completer les fleurs alors que les fleurs ne completaient pas l'ombre dans le cadrage plus serré. C'est mon premier feeling!
2 points... pour le set-up.

Jipp (26) 2004-02-05 21:39

I must add that this shot is beautifull. :)

I think the 5 different levels/planes from bottom to top(les plans en francais) are what makes it so pleasant to look at. ie.the boat in calm water, the far away water, the green mountain, the rocky mountain and finally the sky, all linked by the rainbow and its reflection. They are all more interesting than the other.

It is so well composed and the main subject, the rainbow(or is it the boat i wouldn't know?), is so sharp! WOW my first favourite on TE.

Jipp (26) 2004-02-05 13:37

I like this shot, Cristina, but there is a little something wrong and I am not sure what it is. It's a feeling. I think it has to do with the bottom third: it is underexposed for a nice scenery shot and does not make for a very interesting "silhouette". the tree and the mountain do though!

Maybe a lower point of view with the tree coming out of the mountain at the very bottom of the frame would have yield a better "silhouette" shot. But like i said, i do like it. Nice subject, prefect background and perfect exposition. do you have more shots of that tree? 1 point!

Jipp (26) 2004-02-04 23:12

Nice shot, I love the opposition of nature and hightech architechture. The top branch really makes the frame balanced.

One thing is anoyes me though, it seems slanted to the right(the small tree and the buildings are not vertical)